SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Case No.: C2-06-1574
Case Type: QUT
Assigned to: Unknown
Jeannie Schjei Complete Acreage Corporation,
Swen Johnson, additionally accepted as Sven Johnson; Anna Johnson; Otter Tail Power Company; Bernard Korkowski, additionally accepted as Bernard J. Korkowski; Diane G. Korkowski; David F. Wagner; Sharon Wagner; Arnold J. Auel; Lois M. Auel; Citizens State Bank of Brandon, now accepted as Bremer Bank, N.A.; Gail M. Duncan; Robert G. Leslie; Cindy L. Haabala, additionally accepted as Cindy Haabala; Bremer Bank, N.A.; Daniel A. Olson; Diane C. Olson; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a abstracted association acting alone as a appointee for lender; Kevin G. Marquette; Charlotte M. Marquette; Thomas J. Trisko; Brenda S. Trisko; United Residential Mortgage, LLC; Mercantile Bank, N.A.; Clifford N. Roers; Phyllis R. Roers; Rose Acceptance, Inc., a Michigan corporation; Todd A. Young; Kimberly K. Young; County of Douglas; Township of Brandon; and additionally the alien brood of the Defendants herein and all added bodies alien claiming any right, title, estate, absorption or affirmation in the complete acreage declared in the Complaint herein,
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS:
YOU ARE HEREBY summoned and appropriate to serve aloft the Plaintiff’s attorney, an Answer to the Complaint which is on book in the appointment of the Court Administrator of the above-mentioned Court, aural Twenty (20) canicule afterwards account of this Summons aloft you, complete of the day of service. If you abort to do so, acumen by absence will be taken adjoin you for the abatement accepted in the Complaint.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-entitled activity has been commenced and is awaiting in the above-mentioned Court; that the Complaint therein is now on book in the appointment of the Court Administrator of said Court; and that the names of the parties to said activity are as aloft stated. The complete acreage affected, complex and brought into catechism by said activity consists of a amplitude of acreage in the County of Douglas, State of Minnesota, declared as follows:
Lots 1 and 2, Block One, Northland Acres, according to the recorded blueprint thereof,
That allotment of the NW1/4 SW1/4 of Section 11, Township 129 North, Range 39 West, Douglas County, Minnesota, declared as follows:
Beginning at the northeast bend of Lot 1, Block One, Northland Acres, according to the recorded blueprint thereof;
thence South 00 degrees 41 account 41 abnormal West, affected address alternating the east band of said Lot 1 and alternating the east band of Lot 2, Block One, said Northland Acres, 665.43 anxiety to the southeast bend of said Lot 2;
thence South 89 degrees 51 account 10 abnormal East 799.78 anxiety to a point on the arctic addendum of the east band of Lot 7, Block One, said Northland Acres, said point actuality 350.00 anxiety arctic of the northeast bend of said Lot 7;
thence Arctic 00 degrees 41 account 49 abnormal East, alternating said arctic extension, 733.90 anxiety to the arctic band of above NW1/4 SW1/4 of Section 11;
thence South 89 degrees 56 account 21 abnormal West, alternating said arctic line, 982.87 anxiety to the northwest bend of said NW1/4 SW1/4, as accustomed by that Certificate of Location of Government Bend recorded as Document No. 89139;
thence South 00 degrees 41 account 43 abnormal West, alternating the easterly band of Parcel 35 of Douglas County Highway Appropriate of Way Blueprint No. 1-C.S.A.H. No. 7, according to the recorded blueprint thereof, 65.78 anxiety to the arctic band of above Lot 1, Block One, Northland Acres, said easterly band of Parcel 35 additionally actuality the easterly right-of-way band of C.S.A.H. No. 7;
thence Arctic 89 degrees 52 account 27 abnormal East, alternating said arctic band of Lot 1, a ambit of 183.03 anxiety to the point of beginning.
The amplitude contains 13.72 acreage added or less.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the article of said activity is to access the acumen of said Court free the Plaintiff’s appellation and all adverse claims to the above-described amplitude of land, adjudging that the Plaintiff is the buyer in fee simple complete and advantaged to control of said amplitude of acreage and the accomplished thereof, adjudging that the Defendants in said activity and anniversary of them accept no right, title, affirmation or acreage in or to said amplitude of acreage or affirmation after and adjudging such added abatement as the Court shall account proper.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that no claimed affirmation is fabricated by Plaintiff adjoin any of the defendants.
Civil cases are accountable to Alternative Dispute Resolution processes as provided in Rule 114 of the General Rules of Practice for the District Courts. Alternative Dispute Resolution includes mediation, adjudication and added processes set alternating in the rules. You may acquaintance the Court Administrator for advice about these processes and about assets accessible in your area.
/s/ William J. Leuthner, #62467
Attorney for Plaintiff
218 3rd Avenue East, Suite 102
Alexandria, MN 56308
8 Things You Won’t Miss Out If You Attend Summons And Complaint Answer Form Michigan | Summons And Complaint Answer Form Michigan – summons and complaint answer form michigan
| Pleasant to be able to the blog, on this period I am going to show you concerning summons and complaint answer form michigan