Contact: Clergyman David M. Wagner, 760-855-3905
RIVERSIDE, Calif., May 30, 2015 /Christian Newswire/ — Lance Corporal Monifa Sterling suffered a cloister aggressive allegation afterwards she placed a aggressive administration adduce mentioned in the Hebrew Scriptures on her computer at her board at Camp Lejune, North Carolina. The adduce was “No weapon that is formed adjoin thee shall prosper” (Isaiah 54:17, KJV).
L.Cpl. Sterling was prosecuted as a bent by the United States Government back she represented herself. She has back appealed her case to the Navy-Marine Corps Cloister of Bent Appeals. She declared that her rights to religious announcement were adequate by the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), a law acclimated in cloister to assure religious liberty.
However, the balloon and the appellate courts said that announcement quotes from the Holy Bible does not aggregate religious exercise, yet they are accusing her of commendation a religious account (which in and of itself is appliance religion.) L.Cpl. Sterling and her attorneys disagree. Says Alternative Institute Director of Aggressive Affairs and Senior Counsel Mike Berry, “Restricting a Marine’s chargeless exercise of adoration is aboveboard unconstitutional.” Alternative Institute and advocate Paul Clement are allurement the cloister to aphorism that the appellate cloister should accept activated RFRA in L.Cpl. Sterling’s case, attention her appropriate to column Bible verses as a anatomy of religious exercise.
What I would like to ask is, back did the US aggressive become able at free which portions of Isaiah are religious? What gave the Marine’s supervisor, who is a above assignment instructor, the appropriate to accomplish this determination? Where did he accept his avant-garde training in Hebrew and Biblical Studies to accomplish that call, and why didn’t the assemblage administrator alarm him on it and alarm in the citizen able on religious affairs–the Navy chaplain?
In a contempo conversation, Dr. James F. Linzey stated, “When did the above assignment adviser become a theologian? Assignment advisers generally acquaint Marines to break in their own lane, acceptation to appear to their own business, their own expertise, and do their own jobs, not burrow into others’ ability and work. It is absolutely accessible to me that the above assignment adviser did not convenance what he preached, but acted alfresco his lane. Had he a catechism about religious expression, he should accept phoned the Navy clergyman assigned to the unit.”
Linzey went on to say, “Had the above assignment adviser a catechism on a medical issue, I am assertive he would accept phoned the medical doctor assigned to the unit. Had he a catechism about a acknowledged matter, he would accept phoned the JAG assigned to the unit. But back the catechism of adoration arose, it appears he affected to be the citizen able and anticipation he knew bigger than the Navy clergyman assigned to the unit.”
Jews, Hebrews, Muslims, Christians, and non-denominational bodies acknowledge and are aggressive by the writings of Isaiah. Isaiah’s writings are not the base of any religion. St. Jerome said that Isaiah was a historian; others said that he was an evangelist, apostle, prophet, conceivably alike a clergyman back he was God’s agent to several kings of Judah. His actual and affected writings were included in Hebrew “Scriptures” unbeknownst to him. Did canonizing the annal of Isaiah magically accomplish it religious? If it weren’t canonized, would the assignment adviser accordingly accept not absitively L.Cpl. Sterling affianced in religious expression? What is the accepted in the US Marine Corps?
Many Christians accuse religion. I apperceive abounding Christians who say they do not accept in organized or academic religion, but who accept in the Bible. Conceivably Isaiah did not see himself as religious as well, but one who artlessly believed in a accord with God and wrote bottomward actual and affected events. H. G. Wells, Nikola Tesla, and Nostradamus are examples of bodies who wrote and said affected things. What makes Isaiah’s statements religious and endemic not? Had a account from either of them been acquaint at L.Cpl. Sterling’s desk, would she accept been court-martialed?
Another archetype begin in the Old Testament is civilian law. Civilian law, begin in the Law of Moses, is not a anatomy of religious material. Abundant of the Torah is civilian law–how to get forth with one addition in association and common living. The absolute American administrative arrangement is based on the Law of Moses, but is not religious at all. The actual abstraction of breaking a law and advantageous a accomplished or accomplishing time is based on the Law of Moses. Did addition balloon to acquaint the assignment adviser this, or was he so blind? So abundant for his ability on religion!
L.Cpl. Sterling, alive for the US aggressive automated complex, begin the account from Isaiah abating and absolutely applicable for her claimed amplitude in her assignment environment. Conceivably she was bent not to be the aing victim of the weapons of warfare of America’s enemies. For this, she was cloister martialed. The account “No weapon formed adjoin you will prosper” artlessly is adage that weapons in aggressive action will not succeed. If that adduce were religious, again every time the Commandant of the United States Marine Corps or any aggressive baton tells U.S. Marines that they will apparently not be afflicted in a action if they chase able procedures, they would be authoritative religious statements. Should they again be cloister martialed for authoritative religious statements back they artlessly acquaint them they ability not be aching in battle? Back the admiral of the United States says, “God absolve America,” should he be impeached? The bifold standards and affectation appearance how batty our country has become.
Similarly, “Thou shalt not steal,” which is a civilian law in the Old Testament, if acquaint at the adventurous Marine’s desk, ability accept landed her in court. But conceivably if declared like this, it ability be apparent for what it is: “Do not booty from others what is not yours.”
Canonizing non-religious statements does not accomplish them religious. Accept you heard Christians say they do not accept in religion, but in a accord with God through Jesus Christ? It is accurate.
According to Merriam-Webster, ‘Religious’ is apropos to or assertive in a religion.’ It agency devout, pious, reverent, godly, god-fearing, and more. Religious announcement on the job can artlessly be ‘pious,’ or ‘reverent.’ Should one be court-martialed for cogent adoration through bashful allegiance or reverence? This is a anatomy of bashful religious expression, aloof like silently announcement a administration adduce from Isaiah. Announcement administration statements is article alike atheists can do, behindhand of who is actuality quoted.
My assessment is that what is ‘religious’ is not for US aggressive assignment advisers to determine, and that the assignment adviser should accept asked the assemblage clergyman for able opinion, but was behindhand in his duties, and should accept been acutely reprimanded. Judges additionally accept no abilities to adjudge such matters. Their ability should be law, not religion. But back they abort to accept that the administrative arrangement they accept affidavit to advocate is based on Old Testament law, they should be arbitrarily accursed for actuality the amateur administrative activists they are.
What is ‘religious’ absolutely is a abstraction that needs added analysis afore court-martialing a US Marine. I’ve apparent abounding administration quotes acquaint and quoted by aggressive leaders, but none of them were court-martialed. Where was L.Cpl. Sterling’s Navy clergyman in all this? Is he activity to be God’s mouthpiece, like Isaiah, and allege absolution to her?
Perhaps L.Cpl. Sterling should accept quoted the blow of Isaiah’s account at her desk: “…and every argot that shall acceleration adjoin thee in acumen thou shalt condemn.” Conceivably she should artlessly alarm bottomward God’s acumen and accusation adjoin the apocryphal acumen handed her by the abandoned mouths of ambidexterity and affectation in that courtroom. My prayers are with L.Cpl. Sterling. May God admission her deliverance.
10 Things To Avoid In No Weapon Formed Against Me Shall Prosper Meaning | No Weapon Formed Against Me Shall Prosper Meaning – no weapon formed against me shall prosper meaning
| Allowed to our blog, in this occasion I’ll provide you with regarding no weapon formed against me shall prosper meaning